This Week: An Open Letter to the PC(USA)

A group of 45 PC(USA) clergy sent an open letter to the denomination yesterday, written by a steering committee of seven pastors and signed by thirty-eight other PC(USA) ministers from around the nation. In the letter, the pastors state that the PC(USA) is "deathly ill" and in crucial need of "radical transformation." They outline proposed forms of action to change certain practices and structures within our denomination.

This open letter has been applauded by some and deemed controversial by others. Some agree with the letter's intent, and others disagree with the proposals and description of the current state of our denomination.

Additionally, some have felt confused and angered that the document is exclusively endorsed by male clergy. No women were included on the steering committee, and women are not represented in the names of concurring pastors.

The Open Letter is listed below. You may also click on this link to read a news story concerning the document. This story from Presbyterian Outlook also contains an additional document entitled "Time For Something New." What are your thoughts on these documents?

February 2, 2011

Brothers and Sisters in Christ,

To say the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) is deathly ill is not editorializing but acknowledging reality. Over the past year, a group of PC(USA) pastors has become convinced that to remain locked in unending controversy will only continue a slow demise, dishonor our calling, and offer a poor legacy to those we hope will follow us. We recently met in Phoenix, and have grown in number and commitment. We humbly share responsibility for the failure of our common life, and are no better as pastors nor more righteous than anyone on other sides of tough issues.

Our denomination has been in steady decline for 45 years, now literally half the size of a generation ago. Most congregations see far more funerals than infant baptisms because we are an aging denomination. Only 1,500 of our 5,439 smallest churches have an installed pastor, putting their future viability as congregations in doubt. Even many larger congregations, which grew well for decades, have hit a season of plateau or decline. Our governing bodies reflect these trends, losing financial strength, staffing, and viability as presbyteries, synods, and national offices.

How we got to this place is less important than how to move forward. We are determined to get past rancorous, draining internal disputes that paralyze our common life and ministry. We believe the PC(USA) will not survive without drastic intervention, and stand ready to DO something different, to thrive as the Body of Christ. We call others of like mind to envision a new future for congregations that share our Presbyterian, Reformed, Evangelical heritage. If the denomination has the ability and will to move in this new direction, we will rejoice. Regardless, a group of us will change course, forming a new way for our congregations to relate. We hate the appearance of schism – but the PC(USA) is divided already. Our proposal only acknowledges the fractured denomination we have become.

Homosexual ordination has been the flashpoint of controversy for the last 35 years. Yet, that issue — with endless, contentious “yes” and “no” votes — masks deeper, more important divisions within the PC(USA). Our divisions revolve around differing understandings of Scripture, authority, Christology, the extent of salvation amidst creeping universalism, and a broader set of moral issues. Outside of presbytery meetings, we mostly exist in separate worlds, with opposing sides reading different books and journals, attending different conferences, and supporting different causes. There is no longer common understanding of what is meant by being “Reformed.” Indeed, many sense that the only unity we have left is contained in the property clause and the pension plan; some feel like withholding per capita is a club used against them, while others feel locked into institutional captivity by property. While everyone wearies of battles over ordination, these battles divert us from a host of issues that affect the way our congregations fail to attract either young believers or those outside the faith. Thus, we age, shrink, and become increasingly irrelevant. Is it time to acknowledge that traditional denominations like the PC(USA) have served in their day but now must be radically transformed?

We need something new, characterized by:

1. A clear, concise theological core to which we subscribe, within classic biblical, Reformed/Evangelical traditions, and a pledge to live according to those beliefs, regardless of cultural pressures to conform;

2. A commitment to nurture leadership in local congregations, which we believe is a primary expression of the Kingdom of God. We will identify, develop, and train a new generation of leaders – clergy and laity;

3. A passion to share in the larger mission of the people of God around the world, especially among the least, the lost, and the left behind;

4. A dream of multiplying healthy, missional communities throughout North America;

5. A pattern of fellowship reflecting the realities of our scattered life and joint mission, with regular gatherings locally, regionally, and nationally to excite our ability to dream together.

Our values include:

1. A minimalist structure, replacing bureaucracy and most rules with relational networks of common purpose;

2. Property and assets under stewardship of the local Session. Dues/Gifts for common administration should only allow and enable continued affiliation among these congregations;

3. Rather than large institutions, joint ventures with specialized ministries as congregations deem helpful [PC(USA) World Mission may be a source of joint support, aspects of the Board of Pensions, Presbyterian Foundation, Presbyterian Global Fellowship, Presbyterians for Renewal conferences, Outreach Foundation, etc.];

4. An atmosphere of support for congregations both within and outside of the PC(USA).

We invite like-minded pastors and elders to a gathering on August 25-27 in Minneapolis to explore joining this movement and help shape its character. Our purpose is to LIVE INTO new patterns as they are created, modeling a way of faith: the worship, supportive fellowship, sharing of best practices, and accessible theology that brings unity and the Spirit's vitality.

OUR PROPOSAL:

1) A Fellowship: The most immediate change we intend is creating a new way of relating in common faith, a Fellowship (name to be determined). The primary purpose of this Fellowship will be the encouragement of local congregations to live out the Good News proclaimed by our Savior, increasing the impact of the Kingdom of Heaven. This Fellowship will exist within current presbyteries for the time being, but energies and resources will flow in new directions. It is an intermediate tool to bring together like-minded congregations and pastors, to enable us to build a future different than our fractured present.

2) New Synod/Presbyteries: In the near future we will need “middle bodies” that offer freedom to express historical, biblical values amid ordination changes in the PC(USA). More importantly, we long for presbytery-like bodies with theological and missional consensus rather than fundamental disagreement over so many core issues. We need new processes that identify and support the next generation of leadership differently than the current model, which unintentionally weeds out the entrepreneurial persons we so desperately need in our congregations. Many current functions should be removed; some, like curriculum and mission relationships, have become less centralized already. We will work with the Middle Governing Bodies Commission since changes to The Book of Order will be needed to step fully into this reality.

3) Possible New Reformed Body: Congregations and presbyteries that remain in a denomination that fundamentally changes will become an insurmountable problem for many. Some members of the Fellowship will need an entity apart from the current PC(USA). It is likely that a new body will need to be created, beyond the boundary of the current PC(USA), while remaining in correspondence with its congregations. The wall between these partner Reformed bodies will be permeable, allowing congregations and pastors to be members in the Fellowship regardless of denominational affiliation. All kinds of possibilities exist, and much will depend on how supportive the PC(USA) can be in allowing something new to flourish.

4) Possible Reconfiguration of the PC(USA): We intend to continue conversations within the PC(USA), and have met with both Louisville’s leadership and that of the Covenant Network in the past few months. We believe the denomination no longer provides a viable future and perceive that the Covenant Network also sees a broken system. We hope to work together to see if some new alignment might serve the whole Church.

Any model that includes an entity outside the PC(USA) does mean fewer remaining congregations, pastors, and elders to fight the challenges of the current PC(USA). Votes will swing in directions that had not been desirable before. For many this outcome simply acknowledges that fighting is not the way we choose to proceed; our goal is not institutional survival but effective faithfulness as full participants in the worldwide Church. We hope to discover and model what a new “Reformed body” looks like in the coming years, and we invite you to join us, stepping faithfully, boldly, and joyfully into the work for which God has called us.

For more information, visit our temporary webpage at www.cpconline.org/fellowship_pcusa or contact us atfellowshippcusa@gmail.com.

Steering Committee:*

Vic Pentz, Peachtree Presbyterian, Atlanta, GA

John Crosby, Christ Presbyterian, Edina, MN

David Peterson, Memorial Drive Presbyterian, Houston, TX

Jim Singleton, First Presbyterian, Colorado Springs, CO

David Swanson, First Presbyterian, Orlando, FL

Rich Kannwischer, St. Andrews, Newport Beach, CA

Mark Toone, Chapel Hill Presbyterian, Gig Harbor, WA

Concurring Pastors:*

G. Christopher Scruggs, Advent Presbyterian, Cordova, TN

Mark Brewer, Bel Air Presbyterian, Los Angeles, CA

Allan Poole, Blacknall Memorial Presbyterian, Durham, NC

Rick Murray, Covenant Presbyterian, Austin, TX

Tim Harrison, Crossroads Presbyterian, Mequon, WI

Bob Burkins, Elmwood United Presbyterian, East Orange, NJ

Doug Pratt, First Presbyterian, Bonita Springs, FL

Mateen Elass, First Presbyterian, Edmond, OK

Rich McDermott, First Presbyterian, Fort Collins, CO

Richard Gibbons, First Presbyterian, Greenville, SC

Dan Baumgartner, First Presbyterian, Hollywood, CA

Jim Birchfield, First Presbyterian, Houston, TX

Jim Davis, First Presbyterian, Kingwood, TX

Jerry Andrews, First Presbyterian, San Diego, CA

John Sowers, First Presbyterian, Spokane, WA

Jim Miller, First Presbyterian, Tulsa, OK

Jack Peebles, First Presbyterian, Yakima, WA
Don Baird, Fremont Presbyterian, Sacramento, CA

Doug Ferguson, Grace Presbyterian, Houston, TX
Bill Teng, Heritage Presbyterian, Alexandria, VA

Ronald W. Scates, Highland Park Presbyterian, Dallas, TX

David Lenz, Hope Presbyterian, Richfield, MN

Paul A. Cunningham, La Jolla Presbyterian, La Jolla, CA

Bob Sanders, Lake Grove Presbyterian, Lake Oswego, OR

Kevin Pound, Mandarin Presbyterian, Jacksonville, FL

John Ortberg, Menlo Park Presbyterian, Menlo Park, CA

Jeff Ebert, Presbyterian Church at New Providence, New Providence, NJ
Douglas Garrard, Palm Desert Community Presbyterian, Palm Desert, CA

Paul Detterman, Presbyterians for Renewal, Louisville, KY

Mike McClenahan, Solana Beach Presbyterian, Solana Beach, CA

Steve Hartman, Third Presbyterian, Richmond, VA

David Joynt, Presbyterian Church of Toms River, Toms River, NJ

Douglas J. Rumford, Trinity United Presbyterian, Santa Ana, CA

Patrick H. Wrisley, University Place Presbyterian, University Place, WA

George Hinman (Senior Pastor) and Tim Snow (Executive Pastor), University Presbyterian, Seattle, WA

Peter Barnes, Westlake Hills Presbyterian, Austin, TX

Baron Eliason, Westminster Presbyterian, Lubbock, TX

*Signatories represent themselves, not necessarily the Session or congregation of their respective churches.